Impact of biofilm-forming ability and multidrug resistance on clinical outcomes of burn wound infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Main Article Content
Abstract
Burn wound infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa represent a major clinical challenge due to the pathogen’s virulence, biofilm-forming capacity, and increasing multidrug resistance (MDR). These factors may adversely affect treatment efficacy and patient outcomes in burn units; however, their combined clinical impact remains insufficiently characterized in hospital-based settings. This study aimed to evaluate the association between biofilm-forming ability, MDR, and clinical outcomes in burn wound infections caused by P. aeruginosa. In this cross-sectional study, 30 non-duplicate P. aeruginosa isolates were obtained from hospitalized burn patients at a tertiary care burn center between March 2022 and March 2023. Bacterial identification was performed using standard microbiological methods. MDR was defined as resistance to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial classes. Biofilm formation was assessed using the microtiter plate assay. Among the 30 patients, 76.7% were male, and the mean age was 45.8 ± 16.9 years. The mean total body surface area (TBSA) was 42.9% ± 20%. Fifteen isolates (50%) were classified as MDR. Biofilm assessment revealed that 40% of isolates were strong biofilm producers, 16.7% moderate, and 43.3% weak producers. No statistically significant associations were identified between biofilm strength, MDR status, TBSA, and clinical outcomes. P. aeruginosa burn wound infections were characterized by a high prevalence of biofilm formation and MDR. While no significant associations with mortality were demonstrated, trends toward poorer outcomes in patients infected with strong biofilm-producing and MDR isolates underscore the clinical relevance of these traits. Larger studies incorporating molecular analyses are warranted to clarify their prognostic significance.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
[1] Alharthi AF, Al Sulaiman K, Alotaibi S, Alqahtani R, Damfu N, Alharbi A, et al. Managing Infections in Burn Patients: Strategies and Considerations for Antimicrobial Dosing. Eur Burn J. 2025;6(4):53. DOI: 10.3390/ebj6040053 PMID: 41133485
[2] Hasannejad-Bibalan M, Jafari A, Sabati H, Goswami R, Jafaryparvar Z, Sedaghat F, et al. Risk of type III secretion systems in burn patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns. 2021;47(3):538-544.
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.04.024 PMID: 32532479
[3] Miranda SW, Asfahl KL, Dandekar AA, Greenberg EP. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quorum Sensing. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1386:95-115.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-08491-1_4 PMID: 36258070
[4] Karygianni L, Ren Z, Koo H, Thurnheer T. Biofilm Matrixome: Extracellular Components in Structured Microbial Communities. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28(8):668-681.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.03.016 PMID: 32663461
[5] Maslova E, Eisaiankhongi L, Sjöberg F, McCarthy RR. Burns and biofilms: priority pathogens and in vivo models. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021;7(1):73. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-021-00243-2 PMID: 34504100
[6] Dabbousi AA, Dabboussi F, Hamze M, Osman M, Kassem II. The Emergence and Dissemination of Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Lebanon: Current Status and Challenges during the Economic Crisis. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11(5):687.
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11050687 PMID: 35625331
[7] Cosentino F, Viale P, Giannella M. MDR/XDR/PDR or DTR? Which definition best fits the resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2023;36(6):564-571.
DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000966 PMID: 37930070
[8] Aguilera-Sáez J, Andreu-Solà V, Larrosa Escartín N, Rodríguez Garrido V, Armadans Gil L, et al. Extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa outbreak in a burn unit: management and solutions. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2019;32(1):47-55. PMID: 31285735
[9] Cho HH, Kwon KC, Kim S, Park Y, Koo SH. Association between Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Resistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2018;48(3):363-368. PMID: 29970441
[10] Silva A, Silva V, López M, Rojo-Bezares B, Carvalho JA, et al. Antimicrobial Resistance, Genetic Lineages, and Biofilm Formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Human Infections: An Emerging One Health Concern. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(8):1248. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12081248 PMID: 37627668
[11] CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 35th ed. CLSI Supplement M100. 2025.
URL: https://clsi.org/shop/standards/m100-ed35/
[12] Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268-81.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x PMID: 21793988
[13] O'Toole GA. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J Vis Exp. 2011;(47):2437. DOI: 10.3791/2437 PMID: 21307833
[14] Biswal I, Arora BS, Kasana D, Neetushree. Incidence of multidrug resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn patients and environment of teaching institution. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(5):DC26-9. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7483.4383 PMID: 24995179
[15] Heydari AA, Jamialahmadi S, Kouhi Noghondar M. Three-Year Evaluation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in Patients Admitted to a University-Affiliated Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2022;15(7):e126998.
DOI: 10.5812/jjm-126998
[16] Singh P, Arsi L. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms: Pathogenicity, Clinical Challenges and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies. The Microbe. 2025;100645.
DOI: 10.1016/j.microb.2025.100645
[17] Wang Y, Xiao Q, Yang Q, Long Y, Jiang Z, et al. Impact of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation by different sequence types on treating lower limb vascular infections. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2025;8:100379.
DOI: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100379 PMID: 40395473
[18] Jordana-Lluch E, Escobar-Salom M, Torrens G, Barceló IM, Estévez MÁ, et al. Corticosteroids modulate biofilm formation and virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biofilm. 2025;9:100289.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100289 PMID: 40539031
[19] Tchakal-Mesbahi A, Abdouni MA, Metref M. Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria Isolated From Burn Wounds In Algeria. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2021;34(2):150-156.
PMID: 34584503
[20] Elfadadny A, Ragab RF, AlHarbi M, Badshah F, Ibáñez-Arancibia E, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: navigating clinical impacts, current resistance trends, and innovations in breaking therapies. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1374466.
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1374466 PMID: 38646632
[21] Kalın G, Alp E, Chouaikhi A, Roger C. Antimicrobial Multidrug Resistance: Clinical Implications for Infection Management in Critically Ill Patients. Microorganisms. 2023;11(10):2575.
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102575 PMID: 37894233
[22] Hirsch EB, Tam VH. Impact of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection on patient outcomes. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(4):441-51.
DOI: 10.1586/erp.10.49 PMID: 20715920
[23] Dutt Y, Dhiman R, Singh T, Vibhuti A, Gupta A, et al. The Association between Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Resistance with Possible Ingenious Bio-Remedial Approaches. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11(7):930.
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11070930 PMID: 35884186